Monday, April 22, 2013
We've Got a Job: The 1963 Birmingham Children's March by Cynthia Levinson
“After the mass meeting, I told my
mother, ‘I want to go to jail…’”
-
Audrey Hendricks, age 9
When civil rights leaders Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth and Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.
failed to rally black community members for a series of protests against
segregation in Birmingham in 1963, the responsibility fell to 4,000 of the city’s
children. With encouragement from Reverend James Bevel, a 26-year-old former
pop musician, children as young as nine agreed to put on their walking shoes and
voluntarily submit to arrest.
With maturity
beyond her years and a board game in tow, Audrey Hendricks became the youngest
participant in the fight against the inequality that still plagued Birmingham,
long after the Supreme Court deemed “separate but equal” unconstitutional. Other
children who joined the protests included Washington Booker III, a rambunctious
14-year-old who grew up in the projects and saw Birmingham’s police force as “the
ultimate terror,” James W. Stewart, a middle-class, light-skinned teenager who
refused to be confined by the system, and Arnetta Streeter, who organized the
Peace Ponies at her school to help needy people in the black community. Their
stories constitute Cynthia Levinson’s award-winning book, We’ve Got a Job: The 1963 Birmingham Children’s March.
Levinson
alternates chapters of the book between these four participants as they prepare
for, participate in, and reminisce about Dr. King’s attempt to “fill the jails”
of Birmingham. Levinson weaves the children’s stories with information about
the laws that governed Birmingham, and the many attempts, including marches,
sit-ins, and boycotts, black Americans participated in to gain the equality
they deserved.
As a fan of
non-fiction writing, I was most excited to read this book, and ultimately, most
disappointed. While Levinson shows clear expertise in her subject, the book
reads like a Wikipedia article, rather than a serious literary work. It lacks
depth and emotion. Reading about little Audrey, alone in jail, I couldn’t help
but wonder if she felt abandoned because her parents had not come to get her,
or scared because she didn’t know anyone in the cell. Was she proud of herself
for taking part in the march, or was did she have moments of regret? While the
subject matter was indeed fascinating, I found the book itself incredibly shallow.
I kept hoping it would finally bare its soul, but found that it was little more
than an unimaginative retelling of history (albeit a lesser known aspect of
history).
Despite the glowing reviews, I found We’ve Got a Job to be a lengthy, dry read, and struggled to believe most students below the senior-level would stick with it
if not required. I would not have finished the book if not for this class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
It seem like this book was very factual based and as you said, does not focus on emotions. I hate this and love this. I hate this because I know I absolutely hate reading books with no emotions from the characters. However, I think very factual reading is good for students to learn. I think that it can really help to prepare students for more college level work in all college courses. Students need to learn to read all different types of read materials, wether is it historical, biographical, autobiographical, science based, ect. Knowing how to read all types of writing will only be beneficial to the students in the long run.
I enjoyed your review. I like books that are based on facts and that is extremely important for the classroom because they should be taught some history. Books such as these will more than likely bore students and may only interest the students who are really into history. There are was to bring out the fun in things when it comes to history, it's just about the way you present it. Good job again with this review
Post a Comment